Texas Domestic Violence Registry Why Survivors Need One Now

Understanding My Experience

I want to share my story because of who comes after me. The women who met him after I did, and never knew what he was capable of.

I found out who he really was too late to protect myself completely. I did manage to get out. But by the time I understood the full truth, other people had already been hurt — and more would be hurt after me, with no way of knowing what they were walking into.

That is who this is for.

The Reality of His Past

He had a history of domestic violence. Not just one victim, but several over the years, even before he met me at 17. The women who came after me did not have access to this information either. They became victims because they had no idea who they were dealing with.

None of it was easy to discover. It was not in a headline. It was not sitting in a public database any of us could check before we trusted him, dated him, loved him, or said yes to a life that later became dangerous.

That gap is what I am trying to close — not just for what happened to me, but for every woman who never got the chance to know what the system already knew.

Texas needs a public, searchable domestic violence registry that gives people access to documented, court-based information before they are trapped, isolated, injured, or killed.

The Danger Is Often Documented Before It Becomes Deadly

Domestic violence is not usually a mystery after the fact.

After someone is killed, people often learn there were signs. Prior arrests. Protective orders. Past victims. Felony convictions. A pattern that did not begin with the person who died.

That is the part that haunts me — not just for myself, but for the ones who came after.

The history existed before any of us. Other people knew. The courts knew. Law enforcement knew. The records were somewhere. But none of the women who loved him knew in time to protect themselves.

Texas has taken real steps to protect survivors. In 2023, the state created a Violent Offender Database to track repeat family violence offenders. That was a start, and starts matter.

But it is not public in the way it needs to be. It does not function like the sex offender registry, where people can search for certain convicted offenders and understand risks in their communities. It also does not require domestic violence offenders to keep registering in the same ongoing way.

That difference matters.

A person can check whether a convicted sex offender lives nearby. A parent can search before a sleepover. A neighbor can learn what the state already knows.

But if someone is dating a person with multiple domestic violence convictions, that history can be far harder to find. The person at risk may have to know which county to search, what name to search, how court records work, and what details matter. Even then, records can be incomplete, confusing, or spread across jurisdictions.

That is not meaningful access. That is a maze — and every woman who came into his life after me had to walk into it blind, the same way I did.

According to the Texas Council on Family Violence, 161 Texans were killed by a domestic partner in 2024. That same year, 104 children lost a parent.

Those are not just numbers. They are families cut in half. Children carrying grief that did not have to be theirs. Parents, siblings, friends, and communities left asking why no one stopped it sooner. Somewhere in nearly every one of those stories is a woman who never got the information that could have changed her decision.

Research consistently shows a pattern in many domestic violence homicides. The person who kills often had a documented history of violence toward the victim, previous partners, or both. Nationally, people convicted of domestic violence also have high rates of reoffending, especially in the first few years after conviction.

The warning signs are often not invisible. They are inaccessible — to the exact people who need them most.

Sign the Petition

Support our cause by signing the petition. Your voice matters!

Sign the petition →

A Registry Would Not Solve Everything, But It Would Close a Dangerous Gap

A registry will not make an abusive person honest. It will not replace shelters, protective orders, counseling, law enforcement response, or survivor advocacy. It will not prevent every tragedy.

But it could give the next woman one piece of information at the moment it matters most.

Before moving in. Before sharing a bank account. Before becoming pregnant. Before leaving family behind. Before believing the story that every ex was "crazy," every arrest was "a misunderstanding," and every violent incident was "taken out of context."

A public Texas Domestic Violence Registry would make some documented histories easier to see. That visibility could change decisions — decisions I wish the women before me, and the women after me, had been able to make with full information.

For survivors, and for the people who haven't become survivors yet, knowledge can be safety. It can be the difference between moving forward and stepping back. It can also validate a fear that someone is trying to dismiss.

Many abusers are skilled at rewriting their own past. They minimize. They blame. They charm. They claim the system was unfair. They say the person before you lied.

When there is no easy way to check the record, the new partner is forced to decide between trust and suspicion. That is a terrible place to put someone — and it is exactly the place he put every woman who came after me.

A carefully built registry would not be based on accusations, rumors, or private stories. It should be based on documented legal findings, such as convictions for qualifying family violence offenses, repeat offenses, and other court-supported criteria set by lawmakers.

That distinction matters. Due process matters. Accuracy matters. So does the safety of the woman who hasn't met him yet.

What Texas Already Has Is Not Enough

The 2023 Violent Offender Database was a meaningful step. It recognized that repeat family violence offenders require attention. It put the issue in the hands of the state instead of leaving every survivor to piece things together alone.

But the current approach still falls short in the places where families need protection most. A stronger registry should include several key elements:

• Public search access. People should be able to search for qualifying offenders by name. Access should not require legal training, insider knowledge, or paid database tools.

• Ongoing registration requirements. If someone qualifies for the registry, they should have to keep information current for a defined period, similar in concept to other offender registration systems. Address changes and identifying details should not disappear into outdated records.

• Clear qualifying standards. The registry should not include every accusation. It should focus on court-proven conduct, especially repeat family violence convictions and serious offenses. Lawmakers can and should draw careful lines.

• Victim safety protections. The registry must never expose survivor information. It should not list victim names, addresses, case details that identify children, or information that could help an abuser retaliate.

• Penalties for noncompliance. A registry without enforcement is just a list. If offenders are required to register, there must be consequences for failing to do so.

• A process for accuracy. There should be a way to correct errors, update records, and handle lawful removal when a registration period ends or a court requires it.

This is not about public shaming. It is about public safety. The next woman deserves access to information that could protect her life.

The Privacy Argument Cannot Outweigh the Next Woman's Right to Know

The main counterargument is predictable. Some people will say a public registry goes too far. They will say it harms people who have served their time. They will worry about misuse, stigma, or false information.

Those concerns should be taken seriously. Any public registry must be careful, accurate, and limited to the right cases.

But domestic violence is not a private mistake when it becomes a documented pattern of harm.

A person with multiple family violence convictions has already brought violence into intimate relationships, more than once. The risk does not vanish because a sentence ends. For many survivors, the danger increases when control is challenged, when a relationship becomes more serious, or when someone tries to leave.

That is why the public interest is different here.

The next person entering that relationship is not a random member of the public looking for gossip. She may be the next target. She may be bringing children into the home. She may be deciding whether to trust someone with keys, finances, transportation, pregnancy, or isolation from family — with no idea that other women already made that same decision, and paid for it.

The state already accepts that certain convictions can create an ongoing public safety concern. That is the logic behind sex offender registration. Domestic violence can also involve patterns, escalation, coercion, and lethal risk.

If Texas can recognize that some histories need to be visible for community safety, it can recognize this one too.

The answer is not to hide the information. The answer is to build the registry carefully. That means:

• No unverified accusations

• No survivor names or identifying details

• Clear qualifying offenses

• Court-based records

• A correction process

• Strong penalties for false use or harassment

• Regular review by lawmakers and survivor advocates

A fair registry and a protective registry can exist at the same time.

Why I Am Pushing This Now

I am not waiting for someone else to fix this. I am doing it for every woman who came after me without knowing what I eventually learned.

I am writing letters to my own state representative and senator. I am also writing to the author of a 2025 bill that tried to create this kind of registry, and to lawmakers positioned to help carry it forward in the 90th Legislature, which convenes in January 2027.

I am connecting with the Texas Council on Family Violence, the statewide coalition already doing this work, because survivor-led advocacy should build alongside people who have been fighting for safety for years.

I am learning the legislative process. I am tracking who has filed bills, who sits on the right committees, and who has shown a willingness to take family violence seriously.

I am also telling the truth about why this matters. Not because it is easy. It is not.

There is a cost to saying publicly that someone hurt you. There is a cost to knowing other women were hurt because none of us had a way to warn each other. There is a cost to revisiting the moment you realize the information was out there, but not reachable in time — for any of us.

Still, silence has a cost too.

If the records of repeat domestic violence offenders stay buried where ordinary people cannot find them, the burden stays on the next woman to become her own investigator. That is backwards.

She should not have to know how to search court portals across multiple counties. A parent should not have to guess whether their child's new partner has a violent felony history. No one should have to wait until after the first threat, first shove, first strangulation, or first police report to learn there were others before them.

The state has information that could help people make safer decisions. The question is whether Texas is willing to make that information usable — for her, before it's too late.

What a Useful Registry Could Change

A registry would not tell anyone what to do. It would not force someone to leave. It would not decide whether a relationship continues.

It would give the next woman a clearer starting point.

She could search a name and see whether a qualifying domestic violence history exists. That information could lead her to slow down, ask harder questions, make a safety plan, contact an advocate, or walk away — while she still has the choice to.

For some, the registry might confirm what their body already knows. Many survivors sense danger before they can prove it. They notice control, jealousy, pressure, anger, isolation, or fear. Then they are told they are overreacting.

A public record can cut through manipulation.

It can also help families and friends speak with more clarity. Instead of saying, "I just have a bad feeling," they can say, "There is a documented history here, and I am scared for you."

That matters because abusers often isolate victims from outside concern. They frame loved ones as enemies. They make the relationship feel like a private world where no one else has the right to ask questions — the same way he made it feel for every woman before her.

A registry would bring some of the truth back into the light, for the woman who needs it next.

This Is About Prevention, Not Punishment

People sometimes talk about domestic violence only after the worst has happened.

After the obituary. After the candlelight vigil. After children have lost a parent. After a community says, "We never thought this would happen here."

But many survivors know the truth. There were signs. There were records. There were people who had been hurt before — the same pattern, over and over, just with a different woman's name attached each time.

Prevention means acting before the final act of violence. It means giving the next person tools before she is in crisis. It means treating domestic violence as a pattern that can repeat, not as a private incident sealed away in someone else's past.

A registry is one prevention tool. It belongs alongside funding for shelters, enforcement of protective orders, housing support, trauma care, firearm safety laws, legal aid, and trained law enforcement response. Survivors need all of those things. But information is part of safety too — and it's the piece that could reach someone before she becomes a survivor at all.

I am fighting for this because I know what it feels like to learn the truth too late, and I know I am not the only one. I know what it feels like to look backward and realize the warning was written down somewhere, just not somewhere any of us could easily see.

No one should have to depend on luck to find out whether the person they are trusting has a documented history of domestic violence.

What I Want Lawmakers to Understand

This issue is not abstract.

It is not about political talking points. It is not about punishing people forever. It is about whether the next woman gets to know what the courts already know.

A Texas domestic violence registry should be built with care, survivor input, legal safeguards, and a clear public safety purpose.

It should protect victims' identities. It should be limited to qualifying offenses. It should include a process for accuracy. It should require ongoing registration for repeat and serious offenders. And it should be searchable by the people whose lives may depend on knowing.

The state cannot promise that every survivor will be safe. No law can do that.

But Texas can stop making critical safety information so hard to find.

I got out. Some of the women who came after him were not as fortunate. Many people never get the chance to learn the full history until the danger has already become their own.

That is why I am fighting for a registry.

Because the past should not be hidden from the next person it may harm.

Sign the Petition

Support our cause by signing the petition. Your voice matters!

Sign the petition →